Anti Immigration

Question:

Why has'nt this happened in the US? A quick glance at the internet reveals widespread American discontent with immigration, much of it quite intense.

Given an obvious support base,why then is there no political party to give voice to this feeling?

Answer:

Most Western countries including my own (Australia) have an anti immigration party. Britain,Austria, France, Belgium et.al. seem to have one.They appear to develop as a political afterthought to large scale non European migration.

Though villified by the media and experiencing altering fortunes they neverthless remain a fixture on the political scene of their respective countries and can recieve anywhere up to 15% of the vote.

There appears to be one notable exception - The United States.Though I profess ignorance to American politics I have yet to see such a party emerge on the American political scene and achieve a measure of prominence.

Which brings me to the question of why? I'd like to think that democracy is such that a party can be formed from modest beginnings such as a meeting in somebodies home, that it could stand candidates at an election and spread the word through door knocking and leaflet drops.

This is often the way that the above mentioned anti immigration parties began. Why has'nt this happened in the US? A quick glance at the internet reveals widespread American discontent with immigration, much of it quite intense.

Given an obvious support base,why then is there no political party to give voice to this feeling?

One Nation? pffffft! They are a politicl irrelevancy...

consigned to the dustbin of history, they don't even get as many votes as the Donkey.

They seem to develop as an after though to a night of heavy drinking at the front bar of the Bigot and Spigot, and like a bad hangover, you wish they would disappear as quick the next morning.. leaving a vague quesiness, and the smell of vomit.

The overwhelming MAJORITY vote for pro-multicultural and immigration parties. Haven't you dolts heard the PM saying we need more workers so badly that you will all have to work till you drop! (strictly voluntary of course! B^D You can always choose to starve! B^)

The current tory government presides over RECORD IMMIGRATION!

One nation did.. it was shrill and hysterical, people walked away..

end of story.

Oh, they did considerably better than that in a couple of elections. The vilification Nicholas mentions and the white anting of the party brought the whole thing undone, but they did a bloody sight better than you establishment flunkies can afford to acknowledge.

I suspect for 2 reasons:

1 The USA is not a democracy in the Swiss localism sense or the Athenian sense but a Republic. Citizens do not vote to decide issues but to elect officials. Elaborate electoral rules and an electoral college make the cost of entry and election in the US prohibitively high; thus the Major US parties with their mirror image immigration policies have a stranglehold on the process. I think election is quite difficult in the usa.

It also takes a massive amount of money and thus new parties to assail the Democrat/Republican oligarchy are hard to form.

2 The massive Jewish population. Australia, the UK and I believe Europe are only about 0.6% Jewish. The USA is 2.5% - 3% Jewish.

Jews have been traditionally perhaps rabidly very pro immigration from way back (they particularly despised the 1925 immigration restriction act) whether they are classically left wing or right wing (neo conservative)

Jews control 11% of the senate, 9% of the congress and have twice the income and I believe as much as 10 times the assets of the average American (Remember they are counted as whites not as hispanic or blacks)

Jews have an enormous number of organizations to represent their ethnic interests.

Some 55% to 60% of media whether magazine, newspaper, Hollywood or TV is controlled by a Jewish person.

The Jewish effect on the USA's immigration policy is superbly explored here in professor Macdonald's "Culture of Critique" http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/Preface.htm

Note however the excellent anti-immigration group http://www.vdare.com often publishes anti-immigration articles from paleo-conservative Jews who obviously identity as Americans rather than neocon Zionist or left wing ethnocentric Jews.

3 The 13% black and 15% Hispanic populations serve to keep the anti-immigration parties down.

Even added together they do not add up to a significant support base, thus there is no political party which represents their whining, anti immigrant, anti-ethnic, anti-life, sad-sack loser racism..

except the Nazi's and Woddy's White Power, although the latter may be a bathroom cleanser!

You have no moral ground from which to make that accusation, racist.

"Of course, recent cultural influences, especially American sexual infantilism has seen a dramatic rise in anglo pedophiles, and even mature women seek to look like little girls to satisfy the warped Anglo apetites".

Ned, It's clear you are a committed defender of your tribe, the paedophiles, but THEY ARE NOT A RACE!

Pathetic, Guano. You think that deleting the line attributing that racist shit of yours to its source will hide your racism?

Feel free to explain how pointing up your hypocritical posturing as an anti-racist is defence of anything, liar.

I haven't said they are, moron. Are you now trying to deny your past rants to the effect that racism doesn't depend on the existence of a target racer?

Indeed. US Democracy does not exist.

The Zionists who own all the politicians and the media in the US are not going to give any anti-immigration party, or anything that does not toe their racial mixing agenda, any chance to form any party.

They have even managed to insinuate laws in the American legal system that makes it almost impossible to even mention the subject without getting arrested for "inciting racial hatred".

America is due to explode. And not before time.

Until Americans, and Britons, take back control of their own countries there is no chance of the will of the people being given a moments thought in the corridors of their governments.

Time for the CSA to restart. I would volunteer immediately.

Very interesting question. It is very expensive to run for office against the current two party system. I believe that opposition to the immigration policies of both parties is a majority, but it takes more than a single issue to gain enough support to be able to raise enough money to become a viable candidate. Single issue (or close to it) candidates tend to be on the extreme edges, or not knowledgeable, of other issues, e.g. Perot and Nader, which precludes them from being taken seriously by significant numbers.

You have no moral ground from which to make that accusation, racist.

Far from it !

And I don't see any reason at all why people would not vote for him.

The fact that the usual invertebrates have been going out of thier way to cover him in slime suggests to me that they regard him as a threat ?

And wouldn't it be nice to have a change from the two single issue parties that now dominate US politics with their single policy ...

"Israel first, middle and last - and fuck America"

Pathetic, Guano. You think that deleting the line attributing that racist shit of yours to its source will hide your racism?

A couple of points. The Consensus opposes immigration and is not Rightwing. Second, overall population density has a lot to do with it. If the US was as crowded as England there would be 3.5billion Americans.