Question:
What, if anything, can K1 legally do to reschedule AOS interview
appointment or otherwise arrange things so the AOS interview falls
outside the 2 year period which would allow K! to receive permanent
resident card status, rather than conditional permanent resident card
which would necessitate jumping through another hoop?
What are the options?
Answer:
I guess you could always just write the USCIS office and let them know
that you can't make the interview appointment for XYZ reason and need to
reschedule it for a later date.
However, personally I wouldn't do it -- what if they never receive your
notice and when you don't show up on June 1st? Or they receive it but it
isn't followed up on properly, or lost? They'll think you skipped the
interview and abandoned your application. Too many "what ifs" for my
comfort level, especially since there really wouldn't be a reason NOT to
go to the interview on June 1st...
The only way I can see would be to reschedule the
AOS interview for a later date, and that's proven to be risky to others
who have done so. It must be done in writing, and it must get to the
appropriate person at your local office in time....and they need to
determine that the reason for postponement was good enough in their eyes
to reschedule. I'm pretty sure the reason of "not wanting to have to
remove conditions later" won't fly in their eyes. If, for some reason,
the letter doesn't get to them in time, or they decline the request to
change the interview date, and you don't show up, you'll be considered a
no-show, they will close your case, and you'll have to petition to re-
open it. Sounds like a hassle to me.
I hope you aren't in Boise, Idaho because they will only issue you a 2
year card no matter how long you've been married. Happened to me and I
was told they were legally within their right to issue me only the 2
year card despite the fact that I had been married 2 years by the time
I got my approval.
You're right, Margaret, for an entrant on a K-1 visa, it's still not
even guaranteed they'll get the 10 year card after 2 years of marriage.
Every local office operates differently.
I guess since the OP's question was hypothetical, he won't be affected
by any of our answers anyway. ;)
Wonder if there is anyone on here brave enough to tell what they did to
achieve the desired postponement, then adjudication which would go ahead
and give them the permanent resident without conditions status.
you know, people should not have to wait over two years to get the
initial aos interview, then wait another 18 months before having to jump
through the hoop again.
gee whillickers, enough already!
There is no consistency from office to office, so there is no rhyme or
reason to the decisions made. There are no clear cut guildelines which
outline the curcumstances under which an interview can be postponed. It
is controlled by the whim of the office or the uncertainty of the USPS.
Until there is consistency - and I wouldn't hold my breath - it's a
crapshoot, and your hypothetical is nothing more than a mildly amusing
intellectual exercise.
In my case I was married July 2002, applied for AOS end of August
2002., got AOS interview December 2002. Due to two screwups on my
fingerprinting and then basically being put on the backburner until
someone decided to do spring cleaning, I then had to go back in March
2004 to be re-fingerprinted and got my approval 6 days after my 2nd
wedding anniversary. You'd think that after all this nonsense they
would have given me a break and issued me the 10 year card.
A couple in a group I own had received their AOS interview date and it
was three days before their 2 year anniversary. I suggested they see if
they can somehow get the 10 year green card and bypass the whole removal
of conditions part of the process. The husband (UKC) went to the USCIS
office in WI via the infopass thingy and just laid it out to them about
them being so near their two year anniversary and is there a way they
could manage to get the 10 year green card instead. The person he spoke
with was compliant and simply changed their interview date to after
their 2 year anniversary. They currently have a 10 year green card.
There is no harm in trying. Some officers will be unwilling to change
interview dates as I have heard of others not being so lucky.
Personally, if it had been my husband and myself in the above scenario,
I think we would have at least tried move the interview date (by being
honest) so we could skip a step. We had our AOS interview 3 months
after filing in person and will be filing to have conditions removed
next month.
If I recall, you are a lawyer -- think like one. Don't ever assume
facts. Would you assume that an 80 year old lady can't have a baby?
[hell, this rule makes more sense if you consider adoption which I don't
remember being a consideration on the Fertile Octegenarian].
What happens if the US citizen dies in the intervening two days?
Accidents do happen.
Also, the law on adjustment of K-1's is ambiguous on grant of non-
conditional status. Apparently, when the condition was introduced in
the 1986 legislation, no one assumed that a K-1 adjustment would ever
take over two years. And on top of that, the 1986 IMFA legislation was
a poorly drafted peice of crap in the first place. So, a K-1 who has
been married over two years does NOT fit within the definition of
spouses subject to conditional residence, but can only be adjusted to
that status. The regulations do not clear up the ambiguity -- so
practice varies.
I posted a hypothetical set of facts which a friend living them
mentioned to me in order to perhaps elicit responses which would
assist this person with options, learned responses such as yours and
the experience of others who find themselves in, more or less, the
same boat.
Your contigency about the usc dying is interesting.
I liked the response from the person who just went to uscis and laid the
cards on the table and let them make the call. i believe matt u. one
time mentioned asking an adjudicating officer at interview to delay
adjudication a small amount of time so the client would get the benefit
of not having to come back and ask for removal of conditions.
we are lawyers are problem solvers, but you know, an ounce of common
sense is sometimes worth a pound of law, and as the late will rogers
said,
"we are all ignorant just on different subjects", and i guess that
includes lawyers, too.